The relationship between the choice of the ideal running footwear and having a running injury is a contentious topic. You will find strongly held thoughts for both sides of this discussion and there is very little scientific research to help you take care of the debate. The concept is that an athlete must have the proper running footwear for their biomechanics in order to prevent an running injury from occurring, so if the incorrect shoe may be used there is an increased chance for injury. Nevertheless, the specific research that supports that commonly used content is just not at this time there bringing about the thoughts and discussions about this issue. The athletic shoes market is valued at several billion dollars and up to fifty percent or maybe more athletes have an overuse injury each year, therefore a great deal is at stake with this argument.
A recent episode of the podiatrist's live show, PodChatLive the show's hosts chatted with the runner and also podiatrist Michael Nitschke concerning this issue and just what purpose, in general does the running footwear play in overuse injury. They also specifically talked over a new shoe made by Nike which they say will decrease the running injury prevalance. You can find some Nike funded investigation which backs up this claim, but that research has not yet been published resulting in a lot of rumours and further fuelling the controversy on this concern. The PodChatLive was useful as it considered all the items without taking one side or another. The 2 hosts and Michael Nitschke are runners themselves and still have to produce judgements not only for what shoes they are intending to run in but additionally help to make recommendations to their clients that they see with clinical conditions. This must be carried out in the circumstance with the uncertainness together with the data which underpins the prescription and use of athletic shoes. Certainly, they believe that comfort is among the most important factor to take into account when making options about running footwear.
In terms of musculoskeletal foot conditions there are actually a lot of totally different alternatives which podiatry practitioners have to handle them. Some of these are what are referred to as passive interventions. Many are methods including heat, cold, infared, etc that the individual that has the problem does not really do something and they are treated with therapies which are passive. Otherwise, you can find what is called the active methods. These are generally treatments which are done by the person that has the foot problem. This would include things like exercises for example strengthening and stretches. There exists some debate between different views about if the active or passive therapies are better.
This entire matter was the main topic of a recent PodChatLive in which the hosts had a chat with Talysha Reeve, a podiatrist from Adelaide, Australia with substantial experience in the active therapies and exercise therapy of foot conditions. PodChatLive is a frequent live stream where the 2 hosts select a issue for each edition and have on some authority or number of specialists on that topic and spend an hour or so discussing the theme with them. The talk goes out live on Facebook and is also later available as a video on YouTube and also as a sound podcast through the typical podcast sites. For the show with Talysha Reeve they reviewed which are the much better active therapies were along with what the factors are usually which Podiatry practitioners really should have when delivering rehab in the clinic. The incredible importance of a good clinical thinking technique to make those judgements are was also considered. Additionally they talked about the practical procedure for treatment in real life, certainly taking into consideration the biopsychosocial aspects, patient adherence and behaviour adjustments. A crucial topic that was discussed involved just how rehab lends itself to remote/online consultation services that there's an increasing pattern towards. This particular edition of PodChatLive is especially recommended to podiatry practitioners for additional details on the controversy around this topic.
One of the more valuable functions that a podiatrist plays can be to measure the vascular or blood circulation status to the feet and lower limb to figure out if people are at risk or not of inadequate healing due to the blood circulation. If a person is at high risk for complications for that reason, then steps must be used to decrease that risk and safeguard the feet from injury, especially if they've got diabetes. The regular live for Podiatry practitioners, PodChatLive devoted a whole episode to this subject. PodChatLive is a no cost continuing learning stream that goes live on Facebook. The supposed market is podiatrists employed in clinical practice, but the actual market include lots of other health care professionals at the same time. In the stream there is lots of dialogue and commentary on Facebook. Later the recorded video version is added to YouTube and the podcast version is added to the typical platforms like Spotify and also iTunes.
In the live on vascular issues and evaluation of the feet the hosts chatted with Peta Tehan, a podiatrist, and an academic at the University of Newcastle, Australia and with Martin Fox who is also a podiatrist and also works in a CCG-commissioned, community-based NHS service in Manchester, UK where he delivers early recognition, analysis and best clinical therapy for individuals with diagnosed peripheral vascular disease. Through the episode there was many real and helpful vascular gems from Martin and Peta. They discussed exactly what a vascular evaluation should look like in clinical practice, the significance of doppler use for a vascular examination (and common mistakes made), all of us listened to several doppler waveforms live (and recognize how depending upon our ears alone is probably not perfect), and recognized the importance of good history taking and testing in people who have known risk factors, especially given that 50% of those with peripheral vascular disorders have no symptoms.
Being familiar with research is an important part of the education of all health care professionals. This consists of equally being able to do research and understand research. This is essential because all health professionals ought to need to be equipped to put into action research conclusions into their clinical practice. At times research conclusions could contradict the beliefs of individual clinicians and they have to have the capabilities to be able to reconcile those variances to give the best evidence dependent treatment for their clients. It will be the research which informs us what therapies do give you results and which ones either fail to work or are no better than a placebo. On the regular chat show for podiatry practitioners, PodChatLive this can be a subject which comes up on a regular basis in the context of a number of issues that they talk about. It's such an important issue that the hosts of the show dedicated a whole edition to the area of research methods and its significance for doctors to really understand.
In this episode on research methods the hosts chatted with the research physical therapist Rod Whiteley. In this livestream they outlined why it's important for all clinicians to often study and understand research reports and become confident doing this. They discussed some suggestions concerning how to examine a publication along the way. They discussed the topic of p values and exactly why 0.05 isn't the magic number as well as the using of confidence intervals, reliability, number needed to treat (NNT) along with the minimal clinically important difference. A single crucial takeaway for all from the episode is usually to understand more about effect sizes. Dr Rod Whiteley PhD is a Specialist Sports Physio who has served for the College of Sports Physiotherapy’s Board as their Chief Examiner and also has worked with several professional and international sports teams as well as individuals in quite a few sports, including Rugby League, Rugby Union, Baseball, Football, Squash, and Athletics.
There are so many professional bodies worldwide that represent so many different specialities and expert groupings. One of these is a organization called i-Fab. They are the International Foot and Ankle Biomechanics association that is a multidisciplinary organization of industry experts who have an interest in foot and ankle biomechanics. They are comprised of teachers, physicians, podiatrists, orthopaedic specialists, engineers, physical therapists and other health care professionals, footwear industry individuals, insole/orthotic suppliers, surgical products manufacturers and related markets. They are quite a varied association. The association endeavors to deliver info on the international activities linked to foot and ankle biomechanics. They connect individuals who are working in the foot and ankle biomechanics field regardless of their location and discipline they may be from. In addition they want to conduct debate on key issues of interest for the global community and make coordinated group wide activities. Most significantly they're seeking to develop a profile for an worldwide critical mass of research activities that are related to foot and ankle biomechanics.
As a result among their key activities is an international conference that is held every 2 yrs. This seminar moves around the world and it has been hosted by a few different countries. The 2018 iFab conference happened in New York City in the USA. An episode of PodChatLive was focused on a comments on that conference. PodChatLive is a regular livestream for podiatrists and after the conference the hosts had a conversation of some of the relevant and interesting papers which were presented at the convention. This discussion was live on Facebook. It was later uploaded to YouTube and provided as a podcast edition available form the majority of the podcast platforms. It was a unique strategy taken by the hosts to evaluate a meeting, because they typically have a different guest on every week to go over a topic. It is not known if they are willing to try and review the 2020 conference.